Meat, crockpot, pickaxe, drill bit

Words used by a late term abortionist to describe the horror of what he does to children in the womb.

This should leave you nauseous.  And if it doesn't, you should check your moral bearings because you are quite lost.

LifesiteNews:

Late-term abortionist LeRoy Carhart, who made headlines in February when one of his patients died in his care, likened a dead, full-term baby inside its mother's womb to “meat in a Crock-Pot” in a new sting video released by Live Action this morning. He also tells the mother to call him instead of 911 if she faces any complications.

In the footage, Carhart jokes about dismembering the unborn baby with “a pickaxe, a drill bit.”

Two separate stings were filmed at Carhart's business in Nebraska, one before and one after the death of Jennnifer Morbelli at his Germantown, Maryland, facility.

At one point Carhart confirms to Live Action's investigator that she will be carrying a dead baby inside her for three days. When the mom asks if the baby will begin to decay, Carhart says, “No, it’s like putting meat in a Crock-Pot, OK?” The child merely “gets softer.”

Carhart counsels the woman to call him instead of dialing 911 in case of an emergency, because “they’ll take you to the hospital, right? They won’t bring you to the clinic.”

He adds he or his assistants will call emergency assistance “if we think you need 911.”

Instead, he hands the mother a packet containing “little drapes and sheets and gloves” in case she goes into labor in her hotel room or home.

It includes a bag to put the baby in. He gives no instructions about what to do if the baby is born alive, insisting, “it's not going to happen.”

But Live Action founder Lila Rose told LifeSiteNews.com that a live birth is a possibility.

“Carhart prides himself on making sure that the child is dead within three hours,” she said. “Carhart is certainly denying that infants are born alive after his abortions. He's very proud of his 'success rate,' as he calls it.”

“But...if he misses the child's heart with the Digoxin shot, if it's entered into the amniotic sack or otherwise, sometimes these children have been born alive,” she added, “We know from other testimonies and from studies done in the UK and elsewhere that children do survive abortion attempts.”

Carhart seems to acknowledge as much on tape, telling the mother if her baby “came out? Oh, yeah, it probably could” survive. “Probably.”

If a mother instead calls 911, her “baby will be given the life-saving care it deserves and that the law provides [for] it,” Rose told LifeSiteNews. “I think that this recommendation to not call 911 is very dangerous for women, because that is another layer of protection for them in case the abortion is putting their health at risk.”

Carhart is all-too familiar with one such instance. Jennifer Morbelli died in his care, after being unable to contact him.

There's more, including the doctor's denial about the woman he essentially killed.  The guy clearly missed his calling.  He'd have fit in nicely with the Nazi doctors at Auschwitz.

Sick SOB.

It's difficult for me to ask God's mercy on him.

So at this time, I won't.

Comments

[Jason]

I used to live in Germantown, MD. And I find what they do just a block off of Wisteria Drive repugnant. We used to live just a mile or so from where these horror currently occur (our pediatrician, a wonderful, caring practice, is just a hundred feet from this abomination). However, as both my wife and I have observed, I find what our side does repugnant as well. Not equally, and I'm not drawing a moral equivalence. However, my wife and I have driven up Wisteria Drive from Germantown Road and had to avert our children's eyes from the graphic scenes depcited on the anti-abortionist's signs so that our children (all four under eight years old at the time) wouldn't go to sleep seeing these graphic images of dismembered fetuses as their last thought before slumber. I believe we can find a middle ground (both Catholic and protestant) where we do not "offend the least of these" while still upholding the sanctity of life for all the world to see.

We need, necessarily, to be in the world, but not of the world. And we need to decry what Gosnell and his ilk do without sullying ourselves with the sort of shock propaganda the world so desperately desires. How to do this? I don't know.

[Rick]

I don't know either Jason.

I wish I did.

[BroKen]

It has been reported that at the end of WWII when German citizens living around concentration camps were forced by the Allied soldiers to tour the camps, they cried, "We didn't know!" Would it have been wrong for someone to have marched around the camps carrying large photos of emaciated bodies pilled like cord would? It would have been propaganda, sure. But wrong?

Yes, we want to protect our children's innocence as long as possible. Or is it that we are afraid to help them process the evil in our midst? Perhaps we are afraid to process... confront it ourselves.

[Jason]

Bro. Ken,
I believe the answer to your last question is probably yes. We are probably a little afraid to help them process the evil in our midst. We'd rather protect them from the evil than acquaint them with the evil.

The answer to your first question is also a big resounding yes as well. Yes, it would have been wrong. Is the forced viewing of objectionable material wrong? Yes. You'd better believe it. Put it in another context. As Christians, we believe it is wrong to lust after the flesh, to abuse our bodies, to have intimate relations outside of marriage, right? Well, then, why don't we protest those by showing hardcore, degrading porn? It's because the viewing of this degrading, disgusting stuff is itself wrong.

The question you seem to be asking is what's wrong with fighting a greater evil with a lesser evil. I would hope the answer to that would be immediately obvious.