Subscribe By Email

Worthy Causes


Categories

August 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

« There must be some seriously sick people in Roanoke Virginia | Main | "I think many people believe that they're Catholic but they build their own personal Catholic Church" »

Saturday, July 14, 2012

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834516bb169e20177435bcaca970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "Ms. Gates, you may have the best intentions...":

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

GoneWithTheWind

Is it moral or proper or reasonable for women to have children who then starve to death or otherwise suffer because the woman couldn't provide for her children? A related and not insignificant question is; is it proper for aid groups to provide aid to women and children when contraception was offered and refused? I fully embrace the idea that individuals should be able to make their own choices and follow their own religious beliefs but shouldn't that make them ineligible for financial, food or medical aid?

Rick

My assumption GWTH is that you did not click through to the link and read through why Ms. Gates assertion that providing birth control in third world countries is not controversial is pure bovine fecal matter...

And that this is the point of this post.

CV1

Birth control is a band-aid. It doesn't solve the problem. In fact, if one were to watch the video (or just think it out), one would realize that birth control opens the door to new problems caused largely by increased sexual activity.

Moral issues should be treated as such. Simple answers do not address the real problem. Drugs are a simple answer. Education and respect for women would be a much better approach. Gates, her partners, and the British government should throw $4 billion at that!

GoneWithTheWind

Rick you begged the question. Is it moral for women to bring children into the world knowing they will die of starvation or suffer because they cannot afford to give them the care they need? Maybe you would prefer if I asked if it were controversial for women to birth children into poverty and famine? Gee! Not controversial but birth control is?

How about this for a simple answer: Don't have children you cannot afford to feed.

Rick

I begged no question of the sort. The focus is the assertion made by Ms. Gates that there is no controversy when in fact there is much... Her assertion is made with the intent to shut down opposition... The video was made to counter that attempt.

The rest isn't relevant.

CV1

How about this for a simple answer: Don't have sex if you can't afford to raise a child. That would be the best form of birth control, but those advocating for more drug induced birth control seem to never consider it.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

BlogAds


Tip Jar


Plainly Offsetting Costs


Search Brutally Honest


  • Google

    WWW
    www.brutallyhonest.org

BlogStuff

Visitors


Creative Commons License

Plainly Quotable