Subscribe By Email

Worthy Causes


Categories

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      

« This needs wider play | Main | Sarah Palin: 'Democrats are protecting this rationing “death panel” from future change' »

Wednesday, December 23, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834516bb169e20120a7753bf9970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Is ObamaCare constitutional?:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

A rebellion of the states? To what end and to who's benefit. This regime won't listen to them or pay any attention to their wailings. Why should they. And the complicit media and courts will continue to allow the disease of egalitarian socialism and Marxist multiculturalism to consume this country.

America is all but road kill carrion to be fed to the jackals of the world now.

It will take more than "lawsuits" to tip the balance back toward reason.

Eventually it will take secession. The House and the Senate have already seceded from the Union defined by the Constitution. It is becoming time for the states to follow suit.

If one of the parties tears up a contract, then that contract is null and void.

The Federal government has torn up the contract.

I was VERY pleasantly surprised to see Mike Bloomberg and Governor Patterson of NYS come out STRONGLY against Obamacare, as they know it will destroy healthcare as it exists in New York state. We've managed to set things up to take care of our own, thank you, and don't need Obama and his gangsters to tell us how to do it or how to pay for it.

The vote-buying in Reid's office is not what makes Obamacare unconstitutional. Obamacare, Medicare, Medicaid, TANF, SSI, food stamps, HUD Section 8 housing, etc. are all blatantly unconstitutional regardless of any machinations in Congress surrounding their passage. Nothing in Article I, Section 8 authorizes Congress to transfer one citizen's property or income to another simply because Congress feels like doing so. The 10th Amendment therefore forbids Congress to do so.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

BlogAds

Tip Jar


Plainly Offsetting Costs


Search Brutally Honest


  • Google

    WWW
    www.brutallyhonest.org

BlogStuff

Visitors


Creative Commons License

Plainly Quotable