The global warming house of cards is on the verge of collapse

So much for peer review:

SCIENTISTS at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.

It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.

The UEA’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) was forced to reveal the loss following requests for the data under Freedom of Information legislation.

The data were gathered from weather stations around the world and then adjusted to take account of variables in the way they were collected. The revised figures were kept, but the originals — stored on paper and magnetic tape — were dumped to save space when the CRU moved to a new building.

The admission follows the leaking of a thousand private emails sent and received by Professor Phil Jones, the CRU’s director. In them he discusses thwarting climate sceptics seeking access to such data.

In a statement on its website, the CRU said: “We do not hold the original raw data but only the value-added (quality controlled and homogenised) data.”

Homogenised data eh?

Dictionary.com provides the definition for those wondering:

to make uniform or similar, as in composition or function

In other words, homogenised to tell a story that otherwise isn't there.

It's time for investigations... it's time to follow the money... it's time for the inconvenient truth to smack the likes of Al Gore upside his fat head.

It's past time.

Crossposted(*).

Comments

[Wm. Donald Tabor Jr]

It will be up to bloggers to shame the MSM into covering this

[Locutisprime]

Those who live in glass houses comes to mind. These dweebs have done a less than impressive job of keeping their shades pulled and now? The entire world can see through their glass house and note what has been going on.

Their supposed truths of global warming and climate change are revealed for what they truly are.....myths and purposeful lies.

Nothing more than partisan lies and purposeful manipulations of data, aimed specifically to lie and protect and foster a political agenda for environmental extremist.

[Choey]

I saw in a news item yesterday that EA CRU was going to address the issues by making its data available to the public. Now, would that be the discarded data, the "tricked" data, the synthesized data or the "hide the decline" data?

[Ruth Skidmore]

Ceasar/government is messing around in God's dominion and they just got slapped up side of the head! Many scientist don't believe in God but he is in control and was in previous times of changes in climate. There are of course scientist who acknowledge a higher power but the ones who don't are most acknowledged in our society today.

[chuck aka xtnyoda]

The spiritual reality, which is of course reality, is that the moment man declared that man could control the climate of the earth God took it personal.

This is the equivalent of man's boast at the tower of Babel, "We will not be divided!"

God said, "Excuse me, aren't you forgetting someone?" And... God set out to prove man a fool for his boast... confused their languages... scattered them over the face of the earth... then... split the earth apart forming the continents with the seas dividing them... and God said something like, "OK guys... hows that for not being divided?!"

Same thing going on with this boast that we would dare declare that we could control the earth's climate. God takes this kind of boast personal... an affront to His character... and gets involved real quick in proving the arrogance of man dead wrong.

Prepare for a very cold winter.

Just thought some might like to know what is really going on.