Subscribe By Email

Plainly Stipendable

Worthy Causes


  • Bloggers for Bob McDonnell

March 2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Plainly on the Brutally Honest Blogroll


Plainly Readable


Recently Updated Weblogs

« Commercial Thoughts on Being a Man | Main | Top Islamic Cleric in America issues threats to U.S. »

Monday, January 05, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834516bb169e2010536b4d271970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Dianne Feinstein not happy with Obama's CIA pick:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Morgan K Freeberg

There is a great multitude among the powerful democrats who regularly contradict that party's adoration of humility, self-denegration, "change," etc. and never get called on it. In other words, if they ever do learn something and change their positions as a result, they'll make sure you never find out about it. You'd expect the opposite.

Barack Obama is one of those people.

Dianne Feinstein is another.

They are both so much more exuberant about communicating their positions, than they are about communicating how they formed them. No "listening tours" for them, nosiree. They know what they know what they know.

So I hope the GoogleDemons don't bury this fight between the two of 'em, as the battle of titan egos builds to a climax. I feel for the people who have to work around it every day. But for this Californian, it's popcorn-time baby. Put it on pay-per-view.

Mommynator

And there's lot of egos at work

Pelosi
Reid
Obama
Feinstein
the rest of the democrats

Might as well pop the popcorn, stock up on the soda and beer, and enjoy the explosion/implosion

tim aka The Godless Heathen

Let in not be lost in this story that Feinstein is actually right and Panetta has no, none, nadda, zip qualifications to run the CIA.

As Obama reaches back to the Clinton administration to fill key positions, (evidently that ‘Change’ that his supporters were ‘Hoping’ for), let us not forget what those years and people brought us. It was the failure of the Clinton CIA that failed to kill/capture Osama Bin Laden when given the opportunity on more than one occasion, (which ironically is the repeated ad nauseam mantra of why Pres. Bush was a failure). The Clinton CIA not only failed to stem the tide of radical Islam but actually emboldened them by failing to engage or confront them, besides a few Cruise missiles. To say nothing of decimating our spy capabilities by not wanting to be associated with the scum who actually know what the other scum are up to.

Coupled with Pannetta being is in line with Obama’s misguided, ignorant and juvenile stance of dialogue with our enemies and kinder, gentler interrogation techniques, we are in line for repeating the same intelligence failures that brought us to where we are today.

While I have no love for Feinstein, I’m glad she spoke up and I hope more Dem’s do the same. Less we are doomed to repeat the Clinton mistakes and the inevitable devastating terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001. (Which no doubt will be blamed, incorrectly, on the ‘failed policies of the Bush administration’).

Mommynator

True, tim, but it still will be a clash of the titan egos no matter who's right or wrong.

Morgan K Freeberg

All that's important, and also -- it's a little strange to go that far without giving Feinstein so much as a phone call. Maybe if you plucked an average homeless dude off the street and made him President, he wouldn't know any better. Obama should, though, with all that experience he has...doing whatever it is he's been doing that makes him so much better qualified than Sarah Palin (who I bet would've given Feinstein at least a phone call).

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

BlogAds


Tip Jar


Plainly Offsetting Costs


Search Brutally Honest


  • Google

    WWW
    www.brutallyhonest.org

Visitors


Creative Commons License

Plainly Quotable


Plainly News