Subscribe By Email

Worthy Causes


Categories

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      

« Nobama Nation | Main | "Change we can believe in" »

Sunday, July 06, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834516bb169e200e5538a53b38833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference What Uranium in Iraq? What victory in Iraq? (UPDATE):

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Okay so you can't say Saddam didn't have any Uranium and you can't say he didn't have any Ricin and you can't say he didn't have any Anthrax.

And the dude was hiding jet planes in the sand, so you can't even say he didn't have a place to hide anything.

But he was a completely safe li'l teddy bear because the U.N. did such a fantastic job neutralizing him with all those strongly-worded letters.

Back from vacation too soon.

Well, this explains why Iran was so hot to see that Iraq's government failed and that chaos ensued.

Once again evidence of two realities.

First, that Saddam Hussein did in fact have the means, ability and desire to pursue nuclear and other weapons (AKA WMD).

Secondly, that the war in Iraq (post surge) is winding down and being won. Al Qaeda is on the run and looking at the future reminder of their own Alamo. but you wouldn't know it by the news coverage today in the media.

And you don't see these headlines or the news being blared from the roof tops of the New York Times, Washington Post, or CNN and MSNBC.

Their motto is, "bad news is good news and no news is worse news and good news is the worst possible news." Therefore, they don't cover it beyond the splib report.

One quick check of Drudge or even Fox (right now) demonstrates those principles of modern day journalism. Either of those stories have already been relegated to the splib pile of yesterdays bad news anomalies.

So. Stupid.

Seriously, you really are.

How many times is this now? How many times have you posted OMG!!! WMD!! IRAQ!! FOUND!!!?

How many victories over al Qeada in Iraq are you going to trumpet without wondering why there have been so many victories with nothing won?

Maybe because you stupidly have denied, despite evidence, that there ever were WMD in Iraq.

You can't have it both ways, salvage. Either there were and most was moved to Iran and Syria, and some buried that was later dug up by us, or there weren't any.

Make up whatever is left of your mind.

Then ask the average Iraqi if nothing has been won.

>You can't have it both ways, salvage. Either there were and most was moved to Iran and Syria, and some buried that was later dug up by us, or there weren't any.

Did ya read the link? It explains in very simple words the reality of that nuclear material.

Have ya noticed that the White House, the State Department and the Pentagon have all officially said OFFICIALLY that the WMD they claimed as justification for the invasion WERE. NOT. THERE.

>Then ask the average Iraqi if nothing has been won.

Shall I ask the dead ones? Shall I ask the families of the dead ones? Shall I ask some of the FOUR MILLION that have been displaced? Shall I ask the mother of the dead children resulting from Iraq's soaring infant mortality rates? Shall I ask the refugees working as prostitutes in Jordan and other countries? Shall I ask the ones that want America to withdraw?

Have ya noticed that the White House, the State Department and the Pentagon have all officially said OFFICIALLY that the WMD they claimed as justification for the invasion WERE. NOT. THERE.

You're a cop, I'm on parole, I'm not allowed to carry a gun, you think I have a revolver in my pocket. So you say "I think Morgan has a revolver in his pocket and I want him frisked."

I get frisked, and you find I have a Sig Sauer P220. Which is not a revolver.

Morgan the parolee must have been a harmless teddy bear then, right? Just like Saddam Hussein?

I wish liberals like you had as much antipathy and acrimony for these deadly terrorists as you have for conservatives. I wish you questioned Saddam Hussein's legitimate use of this deadly material, as passionately as you question the God-given right of law-abiding (non-parolee) private citizens to defend their families with Sig Sauer P220's.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

BlogAds

Tip Jar


Plainly Offsetting Costs


Search Brutally Honest


  • Google

    WWW
    www.brutallyhonest.org

BlogStuff

Visitors


Creative Commons License

Plainly Quotable