Subscribe By Email

Plainly Stipendable

Worthy Causes


  • Help Renee Defeat Bob Ethridge

September 2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    

Plainly Readable


Recently Updated Weblogs

« Picking and choosing your NIEs | Main | Masterful »

Thursday, June 26, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834516bb169e200e55372f4c18833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Dahlia Lithwick on the Supreme Court: "All the judges are white and/or old":

» I Remember The Good Old Days from small dead animals
When our best talent moved to the US.... Anybody who believes the current Supreme Court looks like America needs to take a few more trips on a Greyhound bus. All the judges are white and/or old; most are both. A... [Read More]

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Her ignorance is only exceeded by her poor attempts at witty repartee.

“If even one of these three justices were to retire, we could easily return to a world in which decisions about who is or isn't an enemy combatant are made with roughly the same sophistication that seventh-grade girls use to decide who's popular.”

She goes on to further prove her stupidity –

“And as a consequence, we find ourselves in a country where the rule of law is an occasional luxury”

Since she’s Canadian, maybe she’s confused about which country she’s actually talking about.

But we shouldn’t be surprised by someone who has been a guest columnist for the New York Times, was a regular guest on The Al Franken Show, and a guest on National Public Radio's newsmagazine.

Yes, Nesweek delves further into the sess pool of liberal freaks disguised as jounalist. Bravo.

Canadian. Enough said.

We don't want her back.

DDT

Canadian, huh. That would explain the most mind-numbingly ignorant passage I found in the entire article:

...it's clear there are four justices on the bench who deeply mistrust the judiciary, in the manner of a Rockette who doesn't care for dancing.

What I wouldn't give for a pleasant (hopefully, to stay that way) dinner conversation with her, or someone from this planet. Is their idea of the "wall of separation" between judiciary & legislature, the same as mine? Do they even have one? Or are they so much into "pack every single panel that has any authority at all with good people like me" that they haven't even put that much thought into it?

IMO the Supreme Court, as it has evolved into an activist social legislative branch, now represents the greatest challenge to America. (Matter of opinion, the devolution of the Supreme Court is a good case study to disprove evolution!)

The lady quoted represents one more mad citizen who resents the rule of constitutional law.

She thinks that people who ride Greyhound Buses represent a cross sectional picture of America? Who rides Greyhound Buses? Not a thing in the world against people who ride Greyhound Buses, but whoever they are they are not cross sectional pictures of this nation.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

BlogAds


Tip Jar


Plainly Offsetting Costs


Search Brutally Honest


  • Google

    WWW
    www.brutallyhonest.org

BlogStuff

Visitors


Creative Commons License

Plainly Quotable


Plainly News