Subscribe By Email

Plainly Stipendable

Worthy Causes


  • Help Renee Defeat Bob Ethridge

September 2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    

Plainly Readable


Recently Updated Weblogs

« Summing it up | Main | GM's Lutz on Global Warming: “It’s a crock of sh*t” »

Saturday, February 23, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834516bb169e200e55081121f8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference What Media Bias:

» No liberal media bias? from Sister Toldjah
Two officers killed in two different motorcade processions, protecting two different politicians. Check out Time magazine headlined each story. But liberal media bias doesnt exist - or so Ive been told. Move along here. Nothing to see.... [Read More]

» There's no bias in the media.... from Media Lies
....right? Tags: obvious media bias [Read More]

» Oh, That Liberal Media from Ed Driscoll.com
Compare and contrast screen grabs of two headlines at Time.... [Read More]

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

It is completely ashame on the magazine's part. It is certainly not a way to do justice for the most responsible profession of the world. I hate people who make bias statement...

This isn't surprising. Over the past five years, viral Bush hatred has become an preferred alternative to reasoned political discourse. To the extent that the president has been divisive, it is more a result of Democratic betrayal on Iraq than anything the president himself has said or done.

The coverage from Time/CNN is quite pitiful. It says a lot about the state of our political culture that Time/CNN thinks it can get away with politicizing the death of presidential bodyguards and escort officers.

Typical. I'm sure we'll never hear recognition of (nevermind apologies for) this kind of stuff. What bias? Hahaha. And the MSM continues to be astonished that the Americans are increasingly critical of the established media monopoly.

I convinced my parents to cancel their sub to Time, a magazine that had become thinner and thinner, physically, and thinner and thinner, content wise.

I wonder about the intellect of people who write for that magazine, just not much there.

Their Bush headline is an outright lie. Kinda makes me wish I had a sub to cancel.

Time had gone south by the mid-Nineties, which is when a friend and longtime subscriber requested a cancellation in a stern letter to the publisher. It's since sunk to a left-wing opinion magazine; The New Republic in denial.

But come on, aside from those waiting in Dentist waiting rooms, does anyone actually read Time?

This is like that old joke....a meteor is going to hit earth and kill everyone. The next day the NY TIMES runs the headline 'Meteor Coming: Women and Minorities Will Die'.

Nothing new.

Were the circumstances of the two incidents identical? I don't remember the Bush incident.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

BlogAds


Tip Jar


Plainly Offsetting Costs


Search Brutally Honest


  • Google

    WWW
    www.brutallyhonest.org

BlogStuff

Visitors


Creative Commons License

Plainly Quotable


Plainly News