Jay Tea at Wizbang brings us the poop:
Down in Houston, an accused terrorist has been sentenced to ten years in prison. Daniel Aljughaifi, alias Abu Mohammed, pleaded guilty to receiving training at an Al Qaeda camp and fighting with the Islamic Courts Union to overthrow the government of Somalia -- until they were defeated and driven out of the country by Somali and Ethiopian troops.
What makes this story fascinating to me is that Abu Mohammed was born Daniel Joseph Maldonado, raised in little Pelham, New Hampshire, and was a regular attendee at the Selimiye Mosque in Methuen, Massachusetts.
This is an American citizen, folks. And, I suspect, the only reason he chose to fight for militant Islam in Somalia and not here was impatience -- he wanted to go where the action was, and there isn't an open conflict within the United States. With his US citizenship, he quite easily could have used his training within this country, against his fellow citizens.
I see this case as an example of why the "flypaper" argument for our involvement in Iraq is appropriate. One of the biggest reasons the 9/11 attacks were so successful was that Al Qaeda overcame one of the Islamists' biggest weaknesses -- impatience -- and took their time to carefully plan and rehearse their strikes. So many other terrorists lack the discipline and restraint to work out such long-term plans. Instead, they strike at the first opportunity, the closest target, instead of in ways that can truly hurt us.
Fascinating... of course the question is, how many more are there out there? And are they as lacking in discipline and patience as Danny-boy Maldonado of little Pelham, New Hampshire?
We better hope so.












Um, there's a gross logical error in the quoted piece:
I see this case as an example of why the "flypaper" argument for our involvement in Iraq is appropriate.
Yet the terrorist did NOT go to Iraq, he went to Somalia. If our military efforts in Iraq are attracting terrorists, then why didn't this terrorist go to Iraq? This evidence argues against the flypaper argument, not for it.
Posted by: Erasmussimo | Tuesday, July 24, 2007 at 10:56 AM