Subscribe By Email

Worthy Causes


Categories

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      

« Sojourner's false front | Main | “A Good Program…to Make Us Safer…Is Over.” »

Tuesday, June 27, 2006

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834516bb169e200d83461003d69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference AP shills for Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth:

» The AP Conducts A Scientific Poll from Flopping Aces
So let me get this straight. Out of 100 contacted, only 19 had seen the movie. And all 19 of them agreed with Gore. Thats 19%..19 freaking percent agreed with Gore, and he has the gall to write this article in such a way as to convey ... [Read More]

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

For those of us who missed it, can you provide a link to the "scores of scientists" who have criticized Gore's movie? I'm serious. I need to learn more about this.

Zos... why not click on some of the links in the post?

Sheez...

You're beginning to embarrass yourself man...

Sigh...

Uh, well, I did click on those links, and all I see is a couple of people quoted with a vague reference to hundreds. Looks to me like you're doing what you accuse the AP of doing. But that type of hypocrisy wouldn't be anything new, would it?

I don't get it. All these climate scientist were contacted by AP and they say Gore got the science right, and you cannot understand it?

As for this mathematically challenged comment:

Out of 100 contacted, only 19 had seen the movie. And all 19 of them agreed with Gore. Thats 19%..19 freaking percent agreed with Gore,

19 out of 19 is 100% dude, you can't ask those who have not seen the movie to comment on whether they agree with the science. Sheesh! I am not going to insult you by saying you are clearly stupid, because you may have made a mistake, but.... wow *shakes head* make ammends brother and correct your mistake

The idea that only 19 out of 100 scientists have seen it seems to say something too.

Bjorn Lomborg's book raises some pretty concerning questions about the data that is supposed to point to environmental disaster. I've yet to see anyone refute him with anything other than eye rolling and name calling.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

BlogAds

Tip Jar


Plainly Offsetting Costs


Search Brutally Honest


  • Google

    WWW
    www.brutallyhonest.org

BlogStuff

Visitors


Creative Commons License

Plainly Quotable