Subscribe By Email

Worthy Causes


Categories

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      

« Can you spare "a pittance of time" on Veterans Day? | Main | Welcome XtnYoda to the 'sphere »

Friday, November 11, 2005

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834516bb169e200d83424ebb453ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference "Yes, he should question their patriotism. Because they're acting unpatriotically.":

» Makin' New Friends! from Sadly, No!
The best thing about Pajamas Media Open Source Media is that they've introduced me to a whole bunch of right-wing bloggers that I otherwise would've never read (mostly because they really suck, but that's another story). So for your enjoyment,... [Read More]

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The innocent always think truth will out. So often they do a poor job of defending themselves. They know they are innocent, so don't want to dignify the lie.

In the thirties, there was widespread belief WWI was caused by the weapons makers. We like to find a scapegoat. It eases our guilt. For the left, who also believed the information, if Bush is guilty of lying, it means they don't have to deal with their guilt.

I'm not sure anything we could have done in Iraq after taking Baghdad would have been any better. Saddam clearly had prepared for a long period of civil war, hoping to wear us down. Ben Laden's crew clearly realized the strategic importance of Iraq, so they would have come no matter what we did. The Suni should have realized their best chance of survival was a peaceful democracy, but they didn't, (if there is a true civil war, they stand to take the most damage). Perhaps we should have recognized Sadr's danger earlier, but hindsight is always so easy. With no human intelligence sources in Iraq, we had no way to avoid major mistakes about who to trust, and who not to.

So it wasn't as easy as people thought. Did anyone have a plan that would have worked any better? There are so many dangers that didn't happen, but a change in our policy might have created, we probably have done as well as anyone could have done.

The real damage is by hurting Bush, it makes the next steps more difficult. Iran is still a great danger. My greatest fear is Iranian nukes against Israel, that trigger a Samson option, that end up killing hundreds of millions. So the democrat's actions by weakening Bush, weaken America. So yes they are quite unpatriotic. When the family is under attack, don't start a fight with your brother. Which is one reason I hate to say they are unpatriotic, some are only ignorant. Ignorance is curable. Truth is the cure.


Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

BlogAds

Tip Jar


Plainly Offsetting Costs


Search Brutally Honest


  • Google

    WWW
    www.brutallyhonest.org

BlogStuff

Visitors


Creative Commons License

Plainly Quotable