Subscribe By Email

Worthy Causes


Categories

June 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30

« Michael Schiavo - a pig to the end | Main | What’s right and what’s wrong? »

Saturday, April 02, 2005

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834516bb169e200d8343f0a7153ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Terri Schiavo - Final thoughts:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Rick - If you are interested, or trust the source, here is what HFA says about the withholding nutrition and hydration: Even those with total bowel obstruction who had been unable to retain any oral fluids and who voluntarily declined intravenous fluids do not complain of thirst or hunger. There is a side effect of starvation and dehydration in which one's metabolism changes and the resulting elevated level of ketones produces a mild sense of euphoria, so that hunger and thirst are not the problem we would imagine. This same phenomenon has been well documented in the self-imposed starvation of Irish prisoners in Northern Ireland who went on strict fasts to cause them to die, if possible, on certain Irish holidays. Once starvation begins, the ensuing metabolic shift eliminates the sense of hunger. The body feeds at first on fat reserves, and later on protein.

It is this sort of information that underlies the bio-ethical support for withholding nutrition in those persons with advanced illness whose greatly impaired quality of life would not be improved, but only prolonged, by supplemental (intravenous or cut-down) methods of delivering nutrition and hydration. In no way is the withholding of food and fluids comparable to the methods or rationalizations employed by Dr. Kevorkian.

Note: Please realize that since we do not know the details of every case we are only speaking in generalities.

Source: http://www.hospicefoundation.org/endOfLifeInfo/nutrition_hydration.asp

Anj,

Terri was not, as the article references, "in the final phase of illness".

Terri was not a "dying person".

Terri did not suffer from "an advanced illness".

Terri was killed, outright and with malice by proponents of the death culture and by a 'husband' ready to live a life he'd started with a new 'wife' and kids absent the distraction of his old 'wife'.

To in any way portray what happened here in the positive is to be a partner in Terri's murder.

Feel free to do so.

I will not.

In case anyone is reading this near the anniversary of Terri's death, please be aware that the above comment by anj is ridiculous. The Northern Ireland political hunger strikers reported horrific effects of starvation; in fact the horror of starvation was their way of making a point: "His eyes were constantly in pain; he could barely see. His skin ached. He had to be rubbed down with cream every few hours and had to sleep on a waterbed to get any relief from the agony of his decomposing skin."
(Source: http://www.inac.org/irishhistory/hungerstrikes/chapters/23)
Since these reports may be biased due to politics, please also look up Kate Adamson and her hellish experience with going without food and water due to a medical problem.
Not eating because you're naturally dying is painless, but if you aren't already dying, it's horrific. To better understand the difference between painlessly avoiding food because you are naturally dying and being painfully forced to starve to death, read this article which cites several doctors:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/370oqiwy.asp?pg=2

In case anyone is reading this near the anniversary of Terri's death, please be aware that the above comment by anj is ridiculous. The Northern Ireland political hunger strikers reported horrific effects of starvation; in fact the horror of starvation was their way of making a point: "His eyes were constantly in pain; he could barely see. His skin ached. He had to be rubbed down with cream every few hours and had to sleep on a waterbed to get any relief from the agony of his decomposing skin."
(Source: http://www.inac.org/irishhistory/hungerstrikes/chapters/23)
Since these reports may be biased due to politics, please also look up Kate Adamson and her hellish experience with going without food and water due to a medical problem.
Not eating because you're naturally dying is painless, but if you aren't already dying, it's horrific. To better understand the difference between painlessly avoiding food because you are naturally dying and being painfully forced to starve to death, read this article which cites several doctors:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/370oqiwy.asp?pg=2

If starvation is supposed to bring about mild euphoria, why is everyone so preoccupied with world hunger?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

BlogAds

Tip Jar


Plainly Offsetting Costs


Search Brutally Honest


  • Google

    WWW
    www.brutallyhonest.org

BlogStuff

Visitors


Creative Commons License

Plainly Quotable